Owens v. Kling

New York Supreme Court

Owens v. Kling

1 N.Y. St. Rep. 769

DecidedJuly 1, 1886

StatusPublished

This text of 1 N.Y. St. Rep. 769 (Owens v. Kling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Owens v. Kling, 1 N.Y. St. Rep. 769 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1886).

Pincite

Opinion

Dykman, J.

The appeal in this action was decided at the last February term of this court by an affirmance of the judgment against the defendant. He has now appealed for a reargument on an allegation that an important and decisive principle of law, applicable to the statute of frauds, was overlooked in making the decision. Without an intimation of our views on the question raised, we have concluded to grant the motion for a reargument.

Motion granted and reargument ordered, without costs.

Cullen, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dykman, J.

The appeal in this action was decided at the last February term of this court by an affirmance of the judgment against the defendant. He has now appealed for a reargument on an allegation that an important and decisive principle of law, applicable to the statute of frauds, was overlooked in making the decision. Without an intimation of our views on the question raised, we have concluded to grant the motion for a reargument.

Motion granted and reargument ordered, without costs.

Cullen, J., concurs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 N.Y. St. Rep. 769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/owens-v-kling-nysupct-1886.