Owens v. Jefferson

404 F. App'x 781
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 13, 2010·No. No. 10-7143·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Curtis Q. Owens appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the district court’s reasoning that Owens failed to properly exhaust available administrative remedies as to his claims of constitutional magnitude as required by 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) (2006). Owens v. Jefferson, No. 0:09-cv-02888-TLW, 2010 WL 3170073 (D.S.C. Aug. 10, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Owens v. Jefferson, 404 F. App'x 781 (4th Cir. 2010).

404 F. App'x 781 (Owens v. Jefferson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Owens v. Jefferson
179 L. Ed. 2d 1223 (Supreme Court, 2011)
Irby v. Nueces County Sheriff
790 F. Supp. 2d 552 (S.D. Texas, 2011)