Owens v. Jamaica Hospital Center

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Owens v. Jamaica Hospital Center

26 A.D.3d 421, 808 N.Y.S.2d 911

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 21, 2006·Published

Opinion

In action to recover damages for medical malpractice and lack of informed consent, the defendants appeal, as limited by their respective briefs, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ruditzky, J.), dated February 4, 2005, as granted the plaintiffs motion, in effect, to vacate the dismissal of the action and to restore the action to the trial calendar.

Ordered that the appeal by the defendant Jamaica Hospital Center is dismissed as withdrawn in accordance with the stipulation dated November 2, 2005; and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from by the remaining defendants; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the respondent payable by the appellants appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

Under the circumstances, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the plaintiffs motion (see Sapir v Krause, Inc., 8 AD3d 356, 357 [2004]; Lopez v Imperial Delivery Serv., 282 AD2d 190, 197 [2001]). Adams, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein, Skelos and Dillon, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In action to recover damages for medical malpractice and lack of informed consent, the defendants appeal, as limited by their respective briefs, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ruditzky, J.), dated February 4, 2005, as granted the plaintiffs motion, in effect, to vacate the dismissal of the action and to restore the action to the trial calendar.

Ordered that the appeal by the defendant Jamaica Hospital Center is dismissed as withdrawn in accordance with the stipulation dated November 2, 2005; and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from by the remaining defendants; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the respondent payable by the appellants appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

Under the circumstances, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the plaintiffs motion (see Sapir v Krause, Inc., 8 AD3d 356, 357 [2004]; Lopez v Imperial Delivery Serv., 282 AD2d 190, 197 [2001]). Adams, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein, Skelos and Dillon, JJ., concur.

Owens v. Jamaica Hospital Center, 26 A.D.3d 421, 808 N.Y.S.2d 911 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

26 A.D.3d 421 (Owens v. Jamaica Hospital Center) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related