Owens v. Holder

475 F. App'x 18
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 1, 2012·No. No. 12-1111·Published

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Francis Daniel Owens, a native and citizen of The Gambia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s denial of his mo[19] tion to reopen immigration proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find no abuse of discretion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1008.23(b)(3) (2012). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Owens (B.I.A. Dec. 20, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Owens v. Holder, 475 F. App'x 18 (4th Cir. 2012).

475 F. App'x 18 (Owens v. Holder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related