Owens v. Harrison

Fourth Circuit

Owens v. Harrison

410 F. App'x 603

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 8, 2011·No. No. 10-7019·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Adam Wade Owens appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Owens v. Harrison, No. 5:08-ct-03100-FL, 2010 WL 2680339 (E.D.N.C. July 6, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Adam Wade Owens appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Owens v. Harrison, No. 5:08-ct-03100-FL, 2010 WL 2680339 (E.D.N.C. July 6, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Owens v. Harrison, 410 F. App'x 603 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

410 F. App'x 603 (Owens v. Harrison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related