Owens v. Hanney
13 U.S. 180, 3 L. Ed. 697, 9 Cranch 180, 1815 U.S. LEXIS 381
This text of 13 U.S. 180 (Owens v. Hanney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Owens v. Hanney, 13 U.S. 180, 3 L. Ed. 697, 9 Cranch 180, 1815 U.S. LEXIS 381 (1815).
Opinion
stated the opinion of the Court to be that the'omission of the names of the jurors was not material. Nothing was said upon the first point.
Judgment affirmed with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Birge-Forbes Co. v. Heye
251 U.S. 317 (Supreme Court, 1920)
Held v. Goldsmith
96 So. 272 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1919)
Birge-Forbes Co. v. Heye
248 F. 636 (Fifth Circuit, 1918)
Plettenberg, Holthaus & Co. v. I. J. Kalmon & Co.
241 F. 605 (S.D. Georgia, 1917)
Kershaw v. Kelsey
100 Mass. 561 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1868)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
13 U.S. 180, 3 L. Ed. 697, 9 Cranch 180, 1815 U.S. LEXIS 381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/owens-v-hanney-scotus-1815.