Owens v. Hanney
13 U.S. 180, 3 L. Ed. 697, 9 Cranch 180, 1815 U.S. LEXIS 381
Opinion
stated the opinion of the Court to be that the'omission of the names of the jurors was not material. Nothing was said upon the first point.
Judgment affirmed with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Owens v. Hanney, 13 U.S. 180, 3 L. Ed. 697, 9 Cranch 180, 1815 U.S. LEXIS 381 (1815).
13 U.S. 180 (Owens v. Hanney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Birge-Forbes Co. v. Heye
251 U.S. 317 (Supreme Court, 1920)
Held v. Goldsmith
96 So. 272 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1919)
Birge-Forbes Co. v. Heye
248 F. 636 (Fifth Circuit, 1918)
Plettenberg, Holthaus & Co. v. I. J. Kalmon & Co.
241 F. 605 (S.D. Georgia, 1917)
Kershaw v. Kelsey
100 Mass. 561 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1868)