Owens v. Hall
13 Ohio St. 571, 13 Ohio St. (N.S.) 571
Opinion
Held:
1. The action may be brought either in the county where the land lies, or in that where one of the defendants resides.
2. A decree for a specific performance on the part of the defendant, without finding or requiring performance on the part of the plaintiff of his part of the agreement, is erroneous.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Owens v. Hall, 13 Ohio St. 571, 13 Ohio St. (N.S.) 571 (Ohio 1862).
13 Ohio St. 571 (Owens v. Hall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Coppolina v. Radice
164 N.E. 643 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1928)
Gem City Acetylene Generator Co. v. Coblentz
86 Ohio St. (N.S.) 199 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1912)
Safarik v. Greenwald
14 Ohio C.C. Dec. 607 (Cuyahoga Circuit Court, 1903)
Osborn v. Lidy
51 Ohio St. (N.S.) 90 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1894)
Jones, McDowell & Co. v. Fletcher
42 Ark. 422 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1883)