Owens v. Hagenbeck-Wallace Shows Co.

192 A. 464, 58 R.I. 268, 112 A.L.R. 124, 1937 R.I. LEXIS 37
Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided June 4, 1937·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

After the filing of our. opinion the defendant, by leave, of court, filed a motion for reargument. We have carefully‘considered said motion and the reasons assigned therefor. The first two points of the motion are merely an elaboration of issues fully briefed and argued at the time of the original hearing of the case in this court. The third point, while dealing with a subject not completely briefed by the defendant, brings to our attention no matters to which consideration was not given before our decision in the case was reached. On the whole motion, therefore, we find nothing suggested therein which was not fully passed upon before the filing of said opinion.

The motion for a reargument is denied and dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Owens v. Hagenbeck-Wallace Shows Co., 192 A. 464, 58 R.I. 268, 112 A.L.R. 124, 1937 R.I. LEXIS 37 (R.I. 1937).

192 A. 464 (Owens v. Hagenbeck-Wallace Shows Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kronovet v. Lipchin
415 A.2d 1096 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1980)
Lebeck v. William A. Jarvis, Inc.
145 F. Supp. 706 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1956)
William Whitman Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.
125 F. Supp. 137 (D. Delaware, 1954)
Palmer v. Chamberlin
191 F.2d 532 (Fifth Circuit, 1951)
Duskin v. Pennsylvania-Central Airlines Corporation
167 F.2d 727 (Sixth Circuit, 1948)