Owens v. Farmers' Bank of Abbeville

Fourth Circuit

Owens v. Farmers' Bank of Abbeville

228 F. 508, 143 C.C.A. 90, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2044

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedDecember 17, 1915

DocketNo. 1393

StatusPublished

This text of 228 F. 508 (Owens v. Farmers' Bank of Abbeville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Owens v. Farmers' Bank of Abbeville, 228 F. 508, 143 C.C.A. 90, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2044 (4th Cir. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The referee found as a conclusion of fact that the appellee bank had no knowledge or reasonable cause to believe that [509]*509the lumber company was insolvent when, on September 8, 1914, and within four months prior to, its bankruptcy, it transferred to the bank a certain $1,000 note to apply upon or as security for a pre-existing debt. Accordingly he reported that the proceeds of the note, which had matured in the meantime and been paid into court, should be turned over to the bank. His report was approved and confirmed by the court below, and the trustee in bankruptcy thereupon brought this appeal.

The question presented is purely one of fact, and we are not persuaded that it has been erroneously decided. It appears to be true, as the appellant contends, that the particular facts testified to by the witnesses are undisputed; but it does not follow, and we cannot agree, that these facts are so convincing or of such probative force as to furnish no support for the inferences drawn by the referee and the learned District Judge. On the contrary, a careful review of the testimony satisfies us that there was at least a fair probability, taking all the circumstances into account, that the bank had no reasonable cause to believe, when the note in question was transferred, that the lumber company was insolvent, or that the transaction would give the bank an unlawful preference over other creditors. Certainly there is no such preponderance of opposing proof as to warrant a reversal by this court on the controlling question of fact.

The decree appealed from must therefore be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The referee found as a conclusion of fact that the appellee bank had no knowledge or reasonable cause to believe that [509]*509the lumber company was insolvent when, on September 8, 1914, and within four months prior to, its bankruptcy, it transferred to the bank a certain $1,000 note to apply upon or as security for a pre-existing debt. Accordingly he reported that the proceeds of the note, which had matured in the meantime and been paid into court, should be turned over to the bank. His report was approved and confirmed by the court below, and the trustee in bankruptcy thereupon brought this appeal.

The question presented is purely one of fact, and we are not persuaded that it has been erroneously decided. It appears to be true, as the appellant contends, that the particular facts testified to by the witnesses are undisputed; but it does not follow, and we cannot agree, that these facts are so convincing or of such probative force as to furnish no support for the inferences drawn by the referee and the learned District Judge. On the contrary, a careful review of the testimony satisfies us that there was at least a fair probability, taking all the circumstances into account, that the bank had no reasonable cause to believe, when the note in question was transferred, that the lumber company was insolvent, or that the transaction would give the bank an unlawful preference over other creditors. Certainly there is no such preponderance of opposing proof as to warrant a reversal by this court on the controlling question of fact.

The decree appealed from must therefore be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

228 F. 508, 143 C.C.A. 90, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2044, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/owens-v-farmers-bank-of-abbeville-ca4-1915.