Owens v. Dillard's
This text of 668 F. App'x 496 (Owens v. Dillard's) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Michael Eugene Owens appeals the district court’s order denying Owens’ motion to set aside an arbitration award. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Owens v. Dillard’s, No. 3:14-cv-00433-FDW-DCK (W.D.N.C. Apr. 13, 2016). We deny Owens’ motions to subpoena for interrogatories, for production of documents, for a transcript at Government expense, and for lay and expert witnesses. We grant Dillard’s motion to strike Owens’ press release and deny Dillard’s motion for sanctions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
668 F. App'x 496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/owens-v-dillards-ca4-2016.