Owens v. Commissioner of Social Security
This text of 96 F. App'x 938 (Owens v. Commissioner of Social Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Steven Owens seeks review of the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to affirm the denial of Social Security disability income benefits pursuant to 20 C.F.R. § 404.1520(f) (2003). Our review of the record discloses that the Commissioner’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order for the reasons [939]*939stated by the district court and the magistrate judge. See Owens v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., No. CA-02-65 (W.D.Va. Sept. 23, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
96 F. App'x 938, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/owens-v-commissioner-of-social-security-ca4-2004.