Owens, Ronroyal J.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Owens, Ronroyal J.

DecidedFebruary 4, 2009

DocketWR-51,354-08

StatusPublished

This text of Owens, Ronroyal J. (Owens, Ronroyal J.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Owens, Ronroyal J., (Tex. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-51,354-08

RONROYAL J. OWENS, Relator

v.

DALLAS DISTRICT CLERK, Respondent

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

CAUSE NOS. W98-67384-T AND W98-01040-T IN THE 283rd JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

FROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original jurisdiction of this Court. Relator filed two applications for writs of habeas corpus in the 283^rd District Court on September 21, 2001. After remand to the district court, this Court denied the applications on May 14, 2003 without written order on the findings of the trial court without a hearing. In his motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus, Relator contends that while his habeas corpus applications were at the district court on remand, he mailed, by certified mail, two supplemental memorandums of law to the Dallas County District Clerk for filing and presentation to the district court. Specifically, he alleges that he mailed a Supplemental Memorandum of law on February 25, 2002 and a Second Supplemental Memorandum of law on August 26, 2002. He alleges that the District Clerk received the supplements on March 4, 2002 and September 3, 2002, but they were not properly filed in the 283rd Judicial District Court of Dallas County. Therefore, he alleges that this Court did not review all of the claims presented in his habeas corpus applications.

In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. The respondent, the District Clerk of Dallas County, is ordered to file a response, answering whether he received and filed the aforementioned Supplemental Memorandums. If the District Clerk determines that these documents were received and filed, he shall forward them to this Court as supplements to Relator's habeas corpus applications.

This application for leave to file a writ of mandamus shall be held in abeyance until the respondent has submitted the appropriate response. Such response shall be submitted within 30 days of the date of this order.

Filed: February 4, 2009

Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-51,354-08

RONROYAL J. OWENS, Relator

v.

DALLAS DISTRICT CLERK, Respondent

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

CAUSE NOS. W98-67384-T AND W98-01040-T IN THE 283rd JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

FROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original jurisdiction of this Court. Relator filed two applications for writs of habeas corpus in the 283^rd District Court on September 21, 2001. After remand to the district court, this Court denied the applications on May 14, 2003 without written order on the findings of the trial court without a hearing. In his motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus, Relator contends that while his habeas corpus applications were at the district court on remand, he mailed, by certified mail, two supplemental memorandums of law to the Dallas County District Clerk for filing and presentation to the district court. Specifically, he alleges that he mailed a Supplemental Memorandum of law on February 25, 2002 and a Second Supplemental Memorandum of law on August 26, 2002. He alleges that the District Clerk received the supplements on March 4, 2002 and September 3, 2002, but they were not properly filed in the 283rd Judicial District Court of Dallas County. Therefore, he alleges that this Court did not review all of the claims presented in his habeas corpus applications.

In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. The respondent, the District Clerk of Dallas County, is ordered to file a response, answering whether he received and filed the aforementioned Supplemental Memorandums. If the District Clerk determines that these documents were received and filed, he shall forward them to this Court as supplements to Relator's habeas corpus applications.

This application for leave to file a writ of mandamus shall be held in abeyance until the respondent has submitted the appropriate response. Such response shall be submitted within 30 days of the date of this order.

Filed: February 4, 2009

Do not publish

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Owens, Ronroyal J., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/owens-ronroyal-j-texcrimapp-2009.