Owens, J. v. Ardmore Automotive, Aplt.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 28, 2021·No. 23 EAP 2021·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

JOHN AND JEAN OWENS, H/W : No. 23 EAP 2021 : :

v. :

: :

ARDMORE AUTOMOTIVE D/B/A ARMEN : CHEVROLET, ARDEX LABORATORIES, : INC., ASHLAND, LLC, CHICAGO : AEROSOL, LLC AND CA ACQUISITION, : LLC, FRANKEL CHEVROLET BUICK, : HENKEL CORPORATION, ILLINOIS TOOL : WORKS, INC., RADIATOR SPECIALTY : COMPANY, SAFETY-KLEEN, SHELL OIL : COMPANY, SUNOCO, INC. (R&M), THE : BERKEBILE OIL COMPANY, THE : BLASTER CORPORATION, UNITED : STATES STEEL CORPORATION, UNIVAR, : INC., CRC INDUSTRIES, INC., UNION OIL : COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA AND : CHEVRON U.S.A., INC., ZEP, INC. :

: :

APPEAL OF: ARDMORE AUTOMOTIVE : D/B/A ARMEN CHEVROLET :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 28th day of December 2021, the Application “for Extraordinary

Relief and for this Court to Maintain this Appeal” is DENIED.

The Application for Leave to File Reply and the Application “to Withdraw and

Discontinue the Appeal” are GRANTED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Owens, J. v. Ardmore Automotive, Aplt., (Pa. 2021).

Owens, J. v. Ardmore Automotive, Aplt. (Owens, J. v. Ardmore Automotive, Aplt.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.