Owens, J. v. Ardmore Automotive, Aplt.
This text of Owens, J. v. Ardmore Automotive, Aplt. (Owens, J. v. Ardmore Automotive, Aplt.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
JOHN AND JEAN OWENS, H/W : No. 23 EAP 2021 : : v. : : : ARDMORE AUTOMOTIVE D/B/A ARMEN : CHEVROLET, ARDEX LABORATORIES, : INC., ASHLAND, LLC, CHICAGO : AEROSOL, LLC AND CA ACQUISITION, : LLC, FRANKEL CHEVROLET BUICK, : HENKEL CORPORATION, ILLINOIS TOOL : WORKS, INC., RADIATOR SPECIALTY : COMPANY, SAFETY-KLEEN, SHELL OIL : COMPANY, SUNOCO, INC. (R&M), THE : BERKEBILE OIL COMPANY, THE : BLASTER CORPORATION, UNITED : STATES STEEL CORPORATION, UNIVAR, : INC., CRC INDUSTRIES, INC., UNION OIL : COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA AND : CHEVRON U.S.A., INC., ZEP, INC. : : : APPEAL OF: ARDMORE AUTOMOTIVE : D/B/A ARMEN CHEVROLET :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 28th day of December 2021, the Application “for Extraordinary
Relief and for this Court to Maintain this Appeal” is DENIED.
The Application for Leave to File Reply and the Application “to Withdraw and
Discontinue the Appeal” are GRANTED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Owens, J. v. Ardmore Automotive, Aplt., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/owens-j-v-ardmore-automotive-aplt-pa-2021.