Owens (Dexter) v. Warden
This text of Owens (Dexter) v. Warden (Owens (Dexter) v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
An unpublis ‘- order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123
SUPREME COURT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
DEXTER OWENS, ND. 69183 Appellant: 3 VS. ‘ g 3 . JAMES G; COX, ? g E Respondent.
DEC ‘% 5 235
TEACH; LWGEMAN CLERK t3?“ EUPREME CQURT
MQSJW DEPUTY CLERK
DRflER BLEEVIISSING APPEAL
This is a pro seappeal from a district court order denying a motion tn dispense with the security requirement. Second Judicial District Caurt, Washes Caunty; Efliatt A. Sat'tler, Judge~ Because no statute 017 muff: rule permits'an appeal from the aforememioned decision, we lack jurisdiction. Castilia U. State, 106 Nev. 849, 352, ?92 P.2d 1133, 1135 (19%). Accordingly, we
ORDER this appeal DISMISSED;
W_+C_Wfl]mt' fiJ. Cherry
cc: Hon! Elliott- A. Sattler, District Judge Dexter Owens Attm‘ney General/Carson City ‘Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk
1‘ _, 217C}
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Owens (Dexter) v. Warden, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/owens-dexter-v-warden-nev-2015.