Owens-Bey v. Rhodes

Fourth Circuit

Owens-Bey v. Rhodes

332 F. App'x 818

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 2, 2009·No. No. 08-2156·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Mu’Min Owens-Bey appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants and denying reconsideration in his employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Owens-Bey v. Rhodes, No. 1:06-cv-02871-AMD (D. Md. Sept. 11, 2008; Sept. 26, 2008). We deny the motion to expedite and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Mu’Min Owens-Bey appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants and denying reconsideration in his employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Owens-Bey v. Rhodes, No. 1:06-cv-02871-AMD (D. Md. Sept. 11, 2008; Sept. 26, 2008). We deny the motion to expedite and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Owens-Bey v. Rhodes, 332 F. App'x 818 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

332 F. App'x 818 (Owens-Bey v. Rhodes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.