Owen-Williams v. City of Gaithersburg, Inc.

435 F. App'x 232
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 20, 2011
DocketNo. 11-1143
StatusPublished

This text of 435 F. App'x 232 (Owen-Williams v. City of Gaithersburg, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Owen-Williams v. City of Gaithersburg, Inc., 435 F. App'x 232 (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Adol T. Owen-Williams, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Owen-Williams v. City of Gaithersburg, Inc., No. 8:10-ev-00185-PJM, 2011 WL 53082 (D.Md. Jan. 7, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
435 F. App'x 232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/owen-williams-v-city-of-gaithersburg-inc-ca4-2011.