Owen-Williams v. City of Gaithersburg, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Owen-Williams v. City of Gaithersburg, Inc.

435 F. App'x 232

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 20, 2011·No. No. 11-1143·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Adol T. Owen-Williams, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Owen-Williams v. City of Gaithersburg, Inc., No. 8:10-ev-00185-PJM, 2011 WL 53082 (D.Md. Jan. 7, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Adol T. Owen-Williams, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Owen-Williams v. City of Gaithersburg, Inc., No. 8:10-ev-00185-PJM, 2011 WL 53082 (D.Md. Jan. 7, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Owen-Williams v. City of Gaithersburg, Inc., 435 F. App'x 232 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

435 F. App'x 232 (Owen-Williams v. City of Gaithersburg, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related