Owen Williams and Maureen Williams v. U.S. Bank National Association

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Owen Williams and Maureen Williams v. U.S. Bank National Association

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 3, 2026

Docket4D2025-0150

StatusPublished

This text of Owen Williams and Maureen Williams v. U.S. Bank National Association (Owen Williams and Maureen Williams v. U.S. Bank National Association) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Owen Williams and Maureen Williams v. U.S. Bank National Association, (Fla. Ct. App. 2026).

Pincite

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

OWEN WILLIAMS and MAUREEN WILLIAMS, Appellants,

v.

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS TRUSTEE FOR THE RMAC TRUST, SERIES 2016-CTT, YASMIN POTTINGER, SILVERLAKES COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC., MARINA POINTE RECREATION ASSOCIATION, INC., UNITED GUARANTY RESIDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH CAROLINA, and BEV. A THOMPSON-INGLETON a/k/a BEVERLY A. THOMPSON-INGELTON, Appellees.

No. 4D2025-0150

[June 3, 2026]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Gary Michael Farmer, Jr., Judge; L.T. Case No. 062022CA015767AXXXCE.

Ian Ricardo Aird of Law Office of Ian Aird, P.A., Pembroke Pines, for appellants.

Richard Slaughter McIver and Joseph Gerard Paggi, III of Kass Shuler, P.A., Tampa, for appellee U.S. Bank National Association as Trustee for the RMAC Trust, Series 2016-CTT.

PER CURIAM.

Appellants challenge the trial court’s entry of the amended final judgment of foreclosure in favor of appellees, as well as a separate order denying appellants’ renewed Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b) motion to vacate final judgment of foreclosure. We affirm the amended final judgment of foreclosure and dismiss the appeal of the order denying appellants’ renewed rule 1.540(b) motion. The appeal of the order denying appellants’ renewed rule 1.540(b) motion is not timely; therefore, we lack jurisdiction to consider that appeal. See Fletcher-Johnson v. Johnson, 423 So. 3d 420, 421 (Fla. 4th DCA 2025) (“An order denying a motion to vacate is separate from the final judgment and is appealable separately.”); Ortiz v. U.S. Bank Tr. Nat’l Ass’n, 393 So. 3d 264, 266 (Fla. 2d DCA 2024) (“Because [Appellant] did not appeal the final judgment or the order denying his first motion to vacate within thirty days of their rendition, we dismiss the untimely appeal of the final judgment and the order for lack of jurisdiction.”).

Affirmed in part, dismissed in part.

GROSS, MAY and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

OWEN WILLIAMS and MAUREEN WILLIAMS, Appellants,

v.

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS TRUSTEE FOR THE RMAC TRUST, SERIES 2016-CTT, YASMIN POTTINGER, SILVERLAKES COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC., MARINA POINTE RECREATION ASSOCIATION, INC., UNITED GUARANTY RESIDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH CAROLINA, and BEV. A THOMPSON-INGLETON a/k/a BEVERLY A. THOMPSON-INGELTON, Appellees.

No. 4D2025-0150

[June 3, 2026]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Gary Michael Farmer, Jr., Judge; L.T. Case No. 062022CA015767AXXXCE.

Ian Ricardo Aird of Law Office of Ian Aird, P.A., Pembroke Pines, for appellants.

Richard Slaughter McIver and Joseph Gerard Paggi, III of Kass Shuler, P.A., Tampa, for appellee U.S. Bank National Association as Trustee for the RMAC Trust, Series 2016-CTT.

PER CURIAM.

Appellants challenge the trial court’s entry of the amended final judgment of foreclosure in favor of appellees, as well as a separate order denying appellants’ renewed Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b) motion to vacate final judgment of foreclosure. We affirm the amended final judgment of foreclosure and dismiss the appeal of the order denying appellants’ renewed rule 1.540(b) motion. The appeal of the order denying appellants’ renewed rule 1.540(b) motion is not timely; therefore, we lack jurisdiction to consider that appeal. See Fletcher-Johnson v. Johnson, 423 So. 3d 420, 421 (Fla. 4th DCA 2025) (“An order denying a motion to vacate is separate from the final judgment and is appealable separately.”); Ortiz v. U.S. Bank Tr. Nat’l Ass’n, 393 So. 3d 264, 266 (Fla. 2d DCA 2024) (“Because [Appellant] did not appeal the final judgment or the order denying his first motion to vacate within thirty days of their rendition, we dismiss the untimely appeal of the final judgment and the order for lack of jurisdiction.”).

Affirmed in part, dismissed in part.

GROSS, MAY and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Owen Williams and Maureen Williams v. U.S. Bank National Association, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/owen-williams-and-maureen-williams-v-us-bank-national-association-fladistctapp-2026.