Owen v. . Williams

191 S.E. 328, 211 N.C. 742, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 208
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMay 19, 1937
StatusPublished

This text of 191 S.E. 328 (Owen v. . Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Owen v. . Williams, 191 S.E. 328, 211 N.C. 742, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 208 (N.C. 1937).

Opinion

Civil actions, brought separately by husband and wife, to recover for services rendered defendant's intestate during her lifetime, by consent consolidated and tried together.

From verdict and judgment for plaintiff in each case, the defendant appeals, assigning errors. It may be fairly debatable whether the case falls in the category ofNesbitt v. Donoho, 198 N.C. 147, 150 S.E. 875, or Staley v. Lowe,197 N.C. 243, 148 S.E. 240, but as there was no motion to nonsuit, and the record is barren of any exceptive assignment of error predicable of a new trial, the verdicts and judgments will be upheld. See Bank v. McCullers,201 N.C. 412, 160 S.E. 497; Edwards v. Matthews, 196 N.C. 39,144 S.E. 300; Winkler v. Killian, 141 N.C. 575, 54 S.E. 540.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Edwards v. . Matthews
144 S.E. 300 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1928)
Farmers Bank of Clayton v. McCullers
160 S.E. 497 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1931)
Winkler v. Killian.
54 S.E. 540 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1906)
Staley v. . Lowe
148 S.E. 240 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1929)
Nesbitt v. . Donoho
150 S.E. 875 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
191 S.E. 328, 211 N.C. 742, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/owen-v-williams-nc-1937.