Owen v. Williams
211 N.C. 742
Opinion
It may be fairly debatable whether the case falls in the category of Nesbitt v. Donoho, 198 N. C., 147, 150 S. E., 875, or Staley v. Lowe, 197 N. C., 243, 148 S. E., 240, but as there was no motion to nonsuit, and the record is barren of any exceptive assignment of error predicable of a new trial, the verdicts and judgments will be upheld. See Bank v. McCullers, 201 N. C., 412, 160 S. E., 497; Edwards v. Matthews, 196 N. C., 39, 144 S. E., 300; Winkler v. Killian, 141 N. C., 575, 54 S. E., 540.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Owen v. Williams, 211 N.C. 742 (N.C. 1937).
211 N.C. 742 (Owen v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Edwards v. . Matthews
144 S.E. 300 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1928)
Farmers Bank of Clayton v. McCullers
160 S.E. 497 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1931)
Winkler v. Killian.
54 S.E. 540 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1906)
Staley v. . Lowe
148 S.E. 240 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1929)
Nesbitt v. . Donoho
150 S.E. 875 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1929)