Owen v. Watson

Indiana Court of Appeals

Owen v. Watson

96 N.E. 1043, 49 Ind. App. 323, 1911 Ind. App. LEXIS 230

CourtIndiana Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 24, 1911

DocketNo. 7,319

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 96 N.E. 1043 (Owen v. Watson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Owen v. Watson, 96 N.E. 1043, 49 Ind. App. 323, 1911 Ind. App. LEXIS 230 (Ind. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinions

Per Curiam.

This appeal is taken from a judgment rendered by the trial court on the cross-complaint of appellee Louisa Z. Watson, foreclosing a mortgage on certain real estate to which appellant held the legal title.

1. We have carefully examined the record in this case, and are of the opinion that the correct result was reached in the trial court. The record and briefs do not disclose any error prejudicial to appellant, and the judgment should therefore be affirmed. The questions presented are not new or unusual, and a discussion of them would be of no value to the legal profession, and certainly would be of no advantage to the parties to this suit.

The judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed without opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This appeal is taken from a judgment rendered by the trial court on the cross-complaint of appellee Louisa Z. Watson, foreclosing a mortgage on certain real estate to which appellant held the legal title.

1. We have carefully examined the record in this case, and are of the opinion that the correct result was reached in the trial court. The record and briefs do not disclose any error prejudicial to appellant, and the judgment should therefore be affirmed. The questions presented are not new or unusual, and a discussion of them would be of no value to the legal profession, and certainly would be of no advantage to the parties to this suit.

The judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed without opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

96 N.E. 1043, 49 Ind. App. 323, 1911 Ind. App. LEXIS 230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/owen-v-watson-indctapp-1911.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack