Owen v. Suncrest Lumber Co.
123 S.E. 927, 187 N.C. 861, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 431
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Owen v. Suncrest Lumber Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 185 N.C. 612 →
Opinion
A careful perusal of the record fails to disclose any reversible or prejudicial error committed on the trial. The case was before us at the Spring Term, 1923, 185 N. C., 612, when a new trial was granted for error in the charge.
¥e have found no error on the present record, hence the verdict and judgment will be upheld.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Owen v. Suncrest Lumber Co., 123 S.E. 927, 187 N.C. 861, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 431 (N.C. 1924).
123 S.E. 927 (Owen v. Suncrest Lumber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Owen v. Suncrest Lumber Co.
117 S.E. 705 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1923)