Owen v. State

149 S.E.2d 600, 248 S.C. 233, 1966 S.C. LEXIS 178
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided July 28, 1966·No. 18543·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This case is controlled by our decision in Dukes v. State, S. C., 149 S. E. (2d) 598 filed contemporaneously herewith. The two cases are concerned with the same indictment and raise the same single issue; they differ only in that they have arrived here via different routes. In the Dukes case, appeal was from a resentence; in this, appeal is by the State from an order of the Honorable John Grimball, Judge of the Fifth Judicial Circuit, in habeas corpus, construing the indictment as having charged highway robbery, not armed robbery, holding that the petitioner, Owen, had served the [235]*235maximum period of confinement provided by law, and ordering him discharged from custody under sentence for that charge.

For the reasons stated in Duke v. State, supra, the judgment is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Owen v. State, 149 S.E.2d 600, 248 S.C. 233, 1966 S.C. LEXIS 178 (S.C. 1966).

149 S.E.2d 600 (Owen v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Crady v. State
151 S.E.2d 670 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1966)