Owen v. State

29 S.W.3d 365, 342 Ark. 542, 2000 Ark. LEXIS 514
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Owen v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 342 Ark. 6
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided November 2, 2000·No. CR 00-820·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Ronald Owen, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk. In Owen v. State, 342 Ark. 6, 26 S.W.3d 122 (2000), we denied appellant’s motion, stating that upon receipt of an affidavit in which counsel accepted responsibility, the motion would be granted. His attorney, Randel Miller, states in his affidavit that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part. We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

Therefore, the motion is granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Owen v. State, 29 S.W.3d 365, 342 Ark. 542, 2000 Ark. LEXIS 514 (Ark. 2000).

29 S.W.3d 365 (Owen v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Owen v. State
26 S.W.3d 122 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2000)