Owen v. Harriott

Indiana Court of Appeals

Owen v. Harriott

86 N.E. 446, 42 Ind. App. 604, 1908 Ind. App. LEXIS 96

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Owen v. Harriott. Read the opinion of the Court — 47 Ind. App. 359 →

Indiana Court of Appeals·Decided December 10, 1908·No. No. 6,914·Published

Opinion

Hadley, J.

Appellee’s petition for a certiorari exhibits 'matters that should be presented to the lower court in the nature of a proceeding to correct the records of such court nunc pro tunc, and thereafter brought to this court under a writ of certiorari. It is not the province of this court to correct errors in the records of the proceedings of the lower court; that should be done in the forum where the errors occurred.

Petition denied,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hadley, J.

Appellee’s petition for a certiorari exhibits 'matters that should be presented to the lower court in the nature of a proceeding to correct the records of such court nunc pro tunc, and thereafter brought to this court under a writ of certiorari. It is not the province of this court to correct errors in the records of the proceedings of the lower court; that should be done in the forum where the errors occurred.

Petition denied,

Owen v. Harriott, 86 N.E. 446, 42 Ind. App. 604, 1908 Ind. App. LEXIS 96 (Ind. Ct. App. 1908).

Pincite

86 N.E. 446 (Owen v. Harriott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.