Owen v. Goodwin

District Court, W.D. North Carolina·Decided November 17, 2023·No. 1:21-cv-00217·Unknown

Opinion

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL CASE NO. 1:21-cv-00217-MR-WCM

JAMES BRADLEY OWEN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) J U D G M E N T ) CHRISTOPHER M. GOODWIN, in his ) individual and official capacities as ) sheriff's deputy of Henderson ) County, North Carolina; BENJAMIN ) HAWKINS, in his individual and ) official capacities as sheriff's deputy ) of Henderson County, North ) Carolina; JACOB TIPTON, in his ) individual and official capacities as ) sheriff's deputy of Henderson ) County, North Carolina; NICHOLAS ) A. NEWELL, in his individual and ) official capacities as sheriff's deputy ) of Henderson County, North ) Carolina; LOWELL S. GRIFFIN, in his ) official capacity as Sheriff of ) Henderson County, North Carolina; ) CHARLES S. MCDONALD, in his ) official capacity as former Sheriff of ) Henderson County, North Carolina; ) and HENDERSON COUNTY, NORTH ) CAROLINA ) ) Defendants, ) ) and ) ) CHRISTOPHER M. GOODWIN, ) JACOB TIPTON, and NICHOLAS A. ) NEWELL, ) ) Counterclaim ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) JAMES BRADLEY OWEN, ) ) Counterclaim ) Defendant. ) ________________________________ )

THIS MATTER came for trial and was heard by the undersigned judge, and a jury was empaneled and answered the issues presented as follows: 1. Did James Bradley Owen commit battery upon the Claimant Jacob Tipton? Answer: NO 2. What amount of compensatory damages, if any, is the Claimant Jacob Tipton entitled to recover of James Bradley Owen? Answer: N/A 3. What amount of compensatory damages, if any, is the Claimant Christopher M. Goodwin entitled to recover of James Bradley Owen? Answer: $40,000 2 Based on the foregoing facts as found by the jury, the Court concludes as a matter of law that the Counterclaim Defendant James Bradley Owen is

not liable to the Counterclaim Plaintiff Jacob Tipton for battery under North Carolina law, and that the Counterclaim Plaintiff Christopher M. Goodwin is entitled to a judgment in the amount of $40,000.00 against the Counterclaim

Defendant James Bradley Owen. Upon the close of the Counterclaim Plaintiffs’ evidence at trial, the Counterclaim Defendant James Bradley Owen made an oral motion for judgment as a matter of law pursuant to Rule 50(a) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure with respect to all claims asserted by the Counterclaim Plaintiffs. The Court granted the Counterclaim Defendant’s Rule 50(a) motion with respect to the punitive damages claims asserted by

Counterclaim Plaintiffs Christopher M. Goodwin and Jacob Tipton on the grounds that there was insufficient evidence of willful, wanton or malicious conduct by James Bradley Owen to sustain a verdict in favor of the Counterclaim Plaintiffs for punitive damages.

Prior to trial, the parties stipulated to the dismissal with prejudice of the counterclaims asserted by the Counterclaim Plaintiff Nicholas A. Newell pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

3 The Court previously entered an Order granting the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and dismissing all of the Plaintiff’s claims

against the named Defendants. Additionally, the Court granted summary judgment in favor of the Counterclaim Plaintiff Christopher M. Goodwin on his counterclaim for assault against the Counterclaim Defendant James

Bradley Owen. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Defendants Christopher M. Goodwin, Benjamin Hawkins, Jacob Tipton, and Nicholas A. Newell are not liable to the Plaintiff James Bradley Owen for

violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and/or violation of Article I § 19 of the North Carolina Constitution, and such claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The

Plaintiff shall recover nothing from the Defendants in the form of damages as to these claims. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Defendants Christopher M. Goodwin, Benjamin Hawkins, Jacob Tipton, and

Nicholas A. Newell are not liable to the Plaintiff James Bradley Owen for assault and battery under North Carolina law, and such claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Plaintiff shall recover nothing from the

Defendants in the form of damages as to these claims. 4 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Defendants Christopher M. Goodwin, Benjamin Hawkins, Jacob Tipton, and

Nicholas A. Newell are not liable to the Plaintiff James Bradley Owen for unlawful deprivation of property in violation of Article I § 19 of the North Carolina Constitution, and such claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

The Plaintiff shall recover nothing from the Defendants in the form of damages as to these claims. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Defendants Christopher M. Goodwin, Benjamin Hawkins, Jacob Tipton, and

Nicholas A. Newell are not liable to the Plaintiff James Bradley Owen for trespass to chattel under North Carolina law, and such claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Plaintiff shall recover nothing from the

Defendants in the form of damages as to these claims. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Defendants Christopher M. Goodwin, Benjamin Hawkins, Jacob Tipton, and Nicholas A. Newell are not liable to the Plaintiff James Bradley Owen for

punitive damages, and such claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Plaintiff shall recover nothing from the Defendants in the form of damages as to these claims.

5 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Defendants Lowell S. Griffin, Charles S. McDonald, and Henderson County,

North Carolina are not liable to the Plaintiff James Bradley Owen for the violation of his civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Monell v. Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 638 (1978), and such claims are DISMISSED

WITH PREJUDICE. The Plaintiff shall recover nothing from the Defendants in the form of damages as to these claims. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Counterclaim Defendant James Bradley Owen is not liable to the

Counterclaim Plaintiff Jacob Tipton for battery, and such claim is therefore DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Counterclaim Plaintiff shall recover nothing from the Counterclaim Defendant in the form of damages as to this

claim. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Counterclaim Defendant James Bradley Owen is liable to the Counterclaim Plaintiff Christopher M. Goodwin for assault as a matter of law, and the

Counterclaim Plaintiff Christopher M. Goodwin shall have and recover of the Counterclaim Defendant James Bradley Owen the sum of Forty Thousand Dollars ($40,000.00) in compensatory damages.

6 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Counterclaim Defendant James Bradley Owen’s oral motion for judgment as

a matter of law pursuant to Rule 50(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is GRANTED IN PART as to the claims for punitive damages asserted by the Counterclaim Plaintiffs Christopher M. Goodwin and Jacob Tipton, and such claim for punitive damages are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that based

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Owen v. Goodwin, (W.D.N.C. 2023).

Owen v. Goodwin (Owen v. Goodwin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Trans Alaska Pipeline Rate Cases
436 U.S. 631 (Supreme Court, 1978)