Owen v. Cochran

Supreme Court of Georgia

Owen v. Cochran

179 S.E.2d 255, 227 Ga. 152, 1971 Ga. LEXIS 622

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 7, 1971

Docket26213

StatusPublished

This text of 179 S.E.2d 255 (Owen v. Cochran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Owen v. Cochran, 179 S.E.2d 255, 227 Ga. 152, 1971 Ga. LEXIS 622 (Ga. 1971).

Pincite

Opinions

Per curiam.

The appellant petitioned for the custody of his eleven-year-old daughter. The child’s mother is deceased. After hearing evidence, the trial court awarded the custody of the child to the mother’s aunt. The appeal is from this judgment. Held:

The evidence shows that in 1961 the father and mother were separated. The mother and the then two and one-half year old child were living in the home of the mother’s parents and aunt. The father came to the home and, in the presence of the child, killed the mother by shooting her repeatedly. The father was indicted for murder, plead guilty and was sentenced to life imprisonment. He was paroled on July 24, 1968.

Since his parole the father has been working regularly, has married a woman with 3 children, and attends church regularly.

The evidence also shows that since 1961 the child has continuously lived in the home with her mother’s aunt. The mother’s parents are now deceased. The child is well-adjusted, happy, attends school and church regularly, and makes good grades. The child testified that she does not "know” her father; that he was pointed out to her once; that he did not try to talk with her; that she is afraid of him; that she did not remember her father killing her mother; that after her mother died and before he went to prison, he threatened to kill her; and that she did not think she could overcome her fear of him.

In Williams v. Crosby, 118 Ga. 296, 298 (45 SE 282), this court said: "But in every case regardless of the parties, the welfare of the child is the controlling and important fact.” See also Harper v. Ballensinger, 226 Ga. 828 (177 SE2d 693). The facts of this case were sufficient to support the trial court’s judgment awarding custody of the child to her mother’s aunt. Lucas v. Smith, 201 Ga. 834, 838 (41 SE2d 527); Sturkie v. Skinner, 214 Ga. 264 (3) (104 SE2d 417); and Perkins v. Courson, 219 Ga. 611 (135 SE2d 388).

Judgment

the Justices concur. Undercofler, J., concurs specially. Robert E. Andrews, for appellant. Robinson, Buice, Harben & Strickland, Emory F. Robinson, for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam.

The appellant petitioned for the custody of his eleven-year-old daughter. The child’s mother is deceased. After hearing evidence, the trial court awarded the custody of the child to the mother’s aunt. The appeal is from this judgment. Held:

The evidence shows that in 1961 the father and mother were separated. The mother and the then two and one-half year old child were living in the home of the mother’s parents and aunt. The father came to the home and, in the presence of the child, killed the mother by shooting her repeatedly. The father was indicted for murder, plead guilty and was sentenced to life imprisonment. He was paroled on July 24, 1968.

Since his parole the father has been working regularly, has married a woman with 3 children, and attends church regularly.

The evidence also shows that since 1961 the child has continuously lived in the home with her mother’s aunt. The mother’s parents are now deceased. The child is well-adjusted, happy, attends school and church regularly, and makes good grades. The child testified that she does not "know” her father; that he was pointed out to her once; that he did not try to talk with her; that she is afraid of him; that she did not remember her father killing her mother; that after her mother died and before he went to prison, he threatened to kill her; and that she did not think she could overcome her fear of him.

In Williams v. Crosby, 118 Ga. 296, 298 (45 SE 282), this court said: "But in every case regardless of the parties, the welfare of the child is the controlling and important fact.” See also Harper v. Ballensinger, 226 Ga. 828 (177 SE2d 693). The facts of this case were sufficient to support the trial court’s judgment awarding custody of the child to her mother’s aunt. Lucas v. Smith, 201 Ga. 834, 838 (41 SE2d 527); Sturkie v. Skinner, 214 Ga. 264 (3) (104 SE2d 417); and Perkins v. Courson, 219 Ga. 611 (135 SE2d 388).

Judgment

the Justices concur. Undercofler, J., concurs specially. Robert E. Andrews, for appellant. Robinson, Buice, Harben & Strickland, Emory F. Robinson, for appellees.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

179 S.E.2d 255, 227 Ga. 152, 1971 Ga. LEXIS 622, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/owen-v-cochran-ga-1971.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack