Owen v. City of Key West
This text of 118 So. 3d 1005 (Owen v. City of Key West) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this workers’ compensation appeal, Claimant asserts the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) erred for six reasons. We find merit in only one-whether the JCC erred in concluding that section 440.34(1), Florida Statutes, prohibited her from approving a retainer agreement whereby Claimant would pay his attorney an hourly fee for defending him at a hearing on the Employer/Carrier’s motion to tax costs. See Jacobson v. Se. Pers. Leasing, Inc., 113 So.3d 1042, 1045 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (“We conclude to the extent that sections 440.34 and 440.105(3)(c), Florida Statutes, prohibit Claimant from [1006]*1006retaining counsel to defend a motion to tax costs against him, those statutes infringe upon Claimant’s constitutional rights under the First Amendment of the Constitution.”). Accordingly, we reverse the order of the JCC denying the motion for approval of the retainer agreement, and remand for entry of an order approving the agreement. On remand, the JCC has the authority to determine whether the proposed fee is reasonable.
REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
118 So. 3d 1005, 2013 WL 4482460, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 13304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/owen-v-city-of-key-west-fladistctapp-2013.