OW v. Byrd

461 So. 2d 967
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 23, 1984·No. 84-1333·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

461 So.2d 967 (1984)

O.W., a Child, Petitioner,
v.
James S. BYRD, Circuit Court Judge, Ninth Judicial Circuit, Respondent.

No. 84-1333.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

November 23, 1984.
Rehearing Denied January 4, 1985.

Joseph W. DuRocher, Public Defender, and Roger L. Weeden, Asst. Public Defender, Orlando, for petitioner.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Brian W. Bayly, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for respondent.

COWART, Judge.

The petition for prohibition is granted and the trial judge is prohibited from further proceedings on the petition for adjudication of delinquency which is based on the child's disregard of a court order. "While an adjudication of delinquency is not a permissible sanction under chapter 39 for a dependent child's disregard of a court order, the trial court still retains its inherent authority to punish for contempt, including, if necessary, placing the child in a secured detention facility for a reasonable period of time." A.O. v. State, 456 So.2d 1173 (Fla. 1984).

PETITION GRANTED.

ORFINGER and FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OW v. Byrd, 461 So. 2d 967 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

461 So. 2d 967 (OW v. Byrd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

J.G. v. State
604 So. 2d 1255 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
TDL v. Chinault
570 So. 2d 1335 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
C.J. v. State
552 So. 2d 182 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1989)