Ovitron Corporation, Cross-Appellee v. General Motors Corporation, Cross-Appellant

512 F.2d 442, 21 Cont. Cas. Fed. 83,959, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 15943
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedFebruary 24, 1975
Docket334, 335, Dockets 73-2285, 73-2486
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 512 F.2d 442 (Ovitron Corporation, Cross-Appellee v. General Motors Corporation, Cross-Appellant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ovitron Corporation, Cross-Appellee v. General Motors Corporation, Cross-Appellant, 512 F.2d 442, 21 Cont. Cas. Fed. 83,959, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 15943 (2d Cir. 1975).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Ovitron Corporation appeals from a decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Dudley B. Bonsai, J., dismissing its antitrust action against General Motors Corporation. 364 F.Supp. 944 (1973). General Motors cross appeals from certain findings made in that opinion.

Ovitron’s complaint alleged that General Motors, through its Delco Division, had deliberately underbid its costs on a government contract in order to capture the market and stifle competition. In his opinion dismissing the complaint Judge Bonsai held that Ovitron, the lowest bidder after General Motors, had failed to present a prima facie case that it would have been awarded the contract had it not been for the lower General Motors bid. Essentially he found that Ovitron did not make a sufficient showing that the Government would have found Ovitron to be a “responsible” supplier — that is, that it had the available plant capacity and personnel and financial resources to successfully complete the contract. We agree arid affirm the judgment on that basis.

We find it unnecessary to reach the issues raised by General Motors on its cross appeal: whether the Squad Radio, the subject of the contract, could constitute the relevant market; whether General Motors could, and did, possess monopoly power in that market; and whether General Motors purposefully bid below its anticipated costs in order to acquire market control.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thompson v. VIGO COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
876 N.E.2d 1150 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2007)
City of Auburn Ex Rel. Board of Public Works & Safety v. Mavis
468 N.E.2d 584 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1984)
American Standard, Inc. v. Bendix Corp.
487 F. Supp. 265 (W.D. Missouri, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
512 F.2d 442, 21 Cont. Cas. Fed. 83,959, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 15943, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ovitron-corporation-cross-appellee-v-general-motors-corporation-ca2-1975.