Oviedo v. Johnson

13 P.3d 556, 170 Or. App. 682, 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 1841
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedNovember 1, 2000
Docket98-03-29, 617M; CA A105889
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 13 P.3d 556 (Oviedo v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Oviedo v. Johnson, 13 P.3d 556, 170 Or. App. 682, 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 1841 (Or. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Judgment requiring payment of court-appointed attorney fees vacated; otherwise affirmed. Alexander v. Johnson, 164 Or App 235, 990 P2d 929 (1999).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Oviedo v. Johnson
39 P.3d 919 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 P.3d 556, 170 Or. App. 682, 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 1841, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oviedo-v-johnson-orctapp-2000.