Overton v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Overton v. State

413 S.W.2d 920, 1967 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1059

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedMarch 15, 1967

DocketNo. 40081

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 413 S.W.2d 920 (Overton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Overton v. State, 413 S.W.2d 920, 1967 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1059 (Tex. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

WOODLEY, Presiding Judge.

This is a bond forfeiture case in which Jack B. McClellan appeals from a judgment making final a judgment nisi forfeiting the appearance bond entered into by James Timothy Overton, as principal, [921]*921and J. H. Stelfox and appellant Jack B. McClellan as sureties, in the sum of $7,-.500.00.

The claims of error raised on this appeal appear to be identical with those raised by the same appellant in his appeal from the forfeiture of the appearance bond of Clifford Henry Bowen in Bowen v. State, Tex. Cr.App., 413 S.W.2d 915, this day decided, which were overruled.

The judgment is affirmed.

MORRISON, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI