Overton v. Purvis

586 S.E.2d 265, 357 N.C. 497, 2003 N.C. LEXIS 1101
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 2, 2003·No. No. 45A03·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals addressing only defendant’s assignment of error as to the last clear chance doctrine. The result in the Court of Appeals did not require it to reach other issues properly preserved by defendant and raised on appeal. These remaining issues relate not only to the amended judgment reversed and remanded by the Court of Appeals, but also to three additional orders entered 6 June 2001 and appealed by defendant in his notice of appeal to the Court of Appeals. Because we now reverse the Court of Appeals’ decision as to the only issue it addressed, on remand, that court should also consider defendant’s remaining issues.

REVERSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Overton v. Purvis, 586 S.E.2d 265, 357 N.C. 497, 2003 N.C. LEXIS 1101 (N.C. 2003).

586 S.E.2d 265 (Overton v. Purvis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scheffer v. Dalton
777 S.E.2d 534 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2015)
Overton v. Purvis
591 S.E.2d 18 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2004)