Overton v. Office of Personnel Management
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2007-3111
HOWARD B. OVERTON,
Petitioner,
v.
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT,
Respondent.
W. Craig James, Mauk & Burgoyne, of Boise, Idaho, argued for petitioner.
Meredyth D. Cohen, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With her on the brief were Peter D. Keisler, Acting Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, and Deborah A. Bynum, Assistant Director.
Appealed from: United States Merit Systems Protection Board NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
Judgment
ON APPEAL from the Merit Systems Protection Board
in CASE NO(S). DE0831050329-C-1
This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
Per Curiam (MICHEL, Chief Judge, RADER, and LINN, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATED: November 13, 2007 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Overton v. Office of Personnel Management (Overton v. Office of Personnel Management) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.