Overstreet v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Overstreet v. State

811 S.W.2d 816, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 996, 1991 WL 110932

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 25, 1991·No. No. 58754·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Movant Tommie W. Overstreet appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Movant Tommie W. Overstreet appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Overstreet v. State, 811 S.W.2d 816, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 996, 1991 WL 110932 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

811 S.W.2d 816 (Overstreet v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.