Overstreet v. State

132 S.E. 779, 35 Ga. App. 255, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 678
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 14, 1926·No. 17123·Published

Opinion

Brovles, C. J.

The motion for a new trial was based upon the usual general grounds only; the verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and the judgment is Affirmed.

Luke, J., concurs. Bloodioorth, J., not participating on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Overstreet v. State, 132 S.E. 779, 35 Ga. App. 255, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 678 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

132 S.E. 779 (Overstreet v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.