Overstreet v. State

132 S.E. 779, 35 Ga. App. 255, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 678
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 14, 1926
Docket17123
StatusPublished

This text of 132 S.E. 779 (Overstreet v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Overstreet v. State, 132 S.E. 779, 35 Ga. App. 255, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 678 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

Brovles, C. J.

The motion for a new trial was based upon the usual general grounds only; the verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and the judgment is Affirmed.

Luke, J., concurs. Bloodioorth, J., not participating on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
132 S.E. 779, 35 Ga. App. 255, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/overstreet-v-state-gactapp-1926.