Overstreet v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Overstreet v. State

807 So. 2d 787, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 1945, 2002 WL 246631

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 22, 2002

DocketNo. 2D01-4253

StatusPublished

This text of 807 So. 2d 787 (Overstreet v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Overstreet v. State, 807 So. 2d 787, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 1945, 2002 WL 246631 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

DAVIS, Judge.

Richard Overstreet appeals the summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion. Overstreet presented one meritorious claim, and the remainder are affirmed without comment. Overstreet correctly claimed that the second sentence imposed on him violated the prohibition against double jeopardy. Although Overstreet identified this claim as a rule 3.850 claim, it is cognizable under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), and will be treated as such. Accordingly, Overstreet’s ten-year sentence is vacated, and the trial court is instructed to reinstate Overstreet’s original five-year sentence. See Hopping v. State, 708 So.2d 263, 265 (Fla.1998).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

GREEN and COVINGTON, JJi, Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVIS, Judge.

Richard Overstreet appeals the summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion. Overstreet presented one meritorious claim, and the remainder are affirmed without comment. Overstreet correctly claimed that the second sentence imposed on him violated the prohibition against double jeopardy. Although Overstreet identified this claim as a rule 3.850 claim, it is cognizable under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), and will be treated as such. Accordingly, Overstreet’s ten-year sentence is vacated, and the trial court is instructed to reinstate Overstreet’s original five-year sentence. See Hopping v. State, 708 So.2d 263, 265 (Fla.1998).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

GREEN and COVINGTON, JJi, Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

807 So. 2d 787, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 1945, 2002 WL 246631, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/overstreet-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack