Overstreet v. State
583 So. 2d 1123, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 8867, 1991 WL 164396
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s convictions but reverse his sentence and remand for resen-tencing within the sentencing guidelines. We find the trial court erred as to the reasons given for departure, the failure to contemporaneously provide written reasons, and in failing to have appellant actually present at the sentencing hearing. See e.g., Jacobs v. State, 567 So.2d 16 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Overstreet v. State, 583 So. 2d 1123, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 8867, 1991 WL 164396 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).
583 So. 2d 1123 (Overstreet v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jacobs v. State
567 So. 2d 16 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)