Overstreet v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Overstreet v. State

583 So. 2d 1123, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 8867, 1991 WL 164396

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 28, 1991

DocketNo. 88-3334

StatusPublished

This text of 583 So. 2d 1123 (Overstreet v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Overstreet v. State, 583 So. 2d 1123, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 8867, 1991 WL 164396 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions but reverse his sentence and remand for resen-tencing within the sentencing guidelines. We find the trial court erred as to the reasons given for departure, the failure to contemporaneously provide written reasons, and in failing to have appellant actually present at the sentencing hearing. See e.g., Jacobs v. State, 567 So.2d 16 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).

ANSTEAD, GUNTHER and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions but reverse his sentence and remand for resen-tencing within the sentencing guidelines. We find the trial court erred as to the reasons given for departure, the failure to contemporaneously provide written reasons, and in failing to have appellant actually present at the sentencing hearing. See e.g., Jacobs v. State, 567 So.2d 16 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).

ANSTEAD, GUNTHER and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

583 So. 2d 1123, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 8867, 1991 WL 164396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/overstreet-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack