Overstreet v. Holder
This text of Overstreet v. Holder (Overstreet v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1202
OJUOLAPE OLIVIA OVERSTREET,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Submitted: April 7, 2009 Decided: April 22, 2009
Before WILKINSON and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Steven Kreiss, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Gregory G. Katsas, Assistant Attorney General, Linda S. Wernery, Assistant Director, James E. Grimes, Senior Litigation Counsel, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Ojuolape Olivia Overstreet, a native and citizen of
Nigeria, petitions for review of an order of the Board of
Immigration Appeals (Board) denying her motion to reopen as
untimely and numerically barred. We have reviewed the
administrative record and the Board’s order and find that the
Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to
reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (c)(2) (2008). We
accordingly deny the petition for review for the reasons stated
by the Board. See In re: Overstreet (B.I.A. Jan. 9, 2008). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Overstreet v. Holder, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/overstreet-v-holder-ca4-2009.