Overstreet & Co. v. Carmichael Grocery Co.
114 S.E. 714, 29 Ga. App. 189, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 146
Opinion
Where the purchaser refuses to take and pay for goods bought, and the vendor elects to sell them, acting for this purpose as agent of the purchaser, and to recover the difference between the contract price and the price on resale, he must give the purchaser timely and definite notice of his election. See Bridges Grocery Co. v. Dan Joseph Co., 9 Ga. App. 189 (70 S. E. 964). Under the facts of the instant case, the court did not err in awarding a nonsuit.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Overstreet & Co. v. Carmichael Grocery Co., 114 S.E. 714, 29 Ga. App. 189, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 146 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).
114 S.E. 714 (Overstreet & Co. v. Carmichael Grocery Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cannon Mills Co. v. Kirkpatrick Inc.
16 S.E.2d 527 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1941)
Tybee Amusement Co. v. Acorn Refining Co.
10 S.E.2d 224 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1940)
Abercrombie v. Georgia Distributing Co.
158 S.E. 530 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)