Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Overstreet & Co. v. Carmichael Grocery Co.

Overstreet & Co. v. Carmichael Grocery Co.

114 S.E. 714, 29 Ga. App. 189, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 146
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 14, 1922
Docket13770
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 114 S.E. 714 (Overstreet & Co. v. Carmichael Grocery Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Overstreet & Co. v. Carmichael Grocery Co., 114 S.E. 714, 29 Ga. App. 189, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 146 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

Where the purchaser refuses to take and pay for goods bought, and the vendor elects to sell them, acting for this purpose as agent of the purchaser, and to recover the difference between the contract price and the price on resale, he must give the purchaser timely and definite notice of his election. See Bridges Grocery Co. v. Dan Joseph Co., 9 Ga. App. 189 (70 S. E. 964). Under the facts of the instant case, the court did not err in awarding a nonsuit.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cannon Mills Co. v. Kirkpatrick Inc.
16 S.E.2d 527 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1941)
Tybee Amusement Co. v. Acorn Refining Co.
10 S.E.2d 224 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1940)
Abercrombie v. Georgia Distributing Co.
158 S.E. 530 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 S.E. 714, 29 Ga. App. 189, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/overstreet-co-v-carmichael-grocery-co-gactapp-1922.