Overshiner v. Martin
87 Ind. 189
This text of 87 Ind. 189 (Overshiner v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Overshiner v. Martin, 87 Ind. 189 (Ind. 1882).
Opinion
Appellants were sued as the endorsers of a promissory note. They ask a reversal of the j udgrocnt entered against them on the ground that the note is not governed by the law merchant, and that they could not be sued jointly with the maker. The note is payable at a bank in this State, and upon such a note an action may be maintained against the makers and endorsers.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
87 Ind. 189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/overshiner-v-martin-ind-1882.