Overseers of the Poor of Hopewell v. Overseers of Amwell

7 N.J.L. 4
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedNovember 15, 1822
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 7 N.J.L. 4 (Overseers of the Poor of Hopewell v. Overseers of Amwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Overseers of the Poor of Hopewell v. Overseers of Amwell, 7 N.J.L. 4 (N.J. 1822).

Opinion

Eord, J.

The practice in the Sessions has been to allow no taxed costs, according to the items of the fee bill. But fees have been allowed the attorney as counsel, and counsel fees have been allowed besides.

Kirkpatrick, O. J.

I do not think that the court could be governed by a more reasonable rule than the fee bill. Rev Laws 481. I am inclined to say that the bill should be allowed as drawn.

Rossell, J., concurred with the Chief Justice.

Ford, J.

Inasmuch as the bill in 1818 was settled in open court, I concur in allowing this bill as drawn.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports, 1957

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 N.J.L. 4, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/overseers-of-the-poor-of-hopewell-v-overseers-of-amwell-nj-1822.