Overseers of Newark v. Overseers of Pompton

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Overseers of Newark v. Overseers of Pompton

3 N.J.L. 1039

DecidedSeptember 15, 1813

StatusPublished

This text of 3 N.J.L. 1039 (Overseers of Newark v. Overseers of Pompton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Overseers of Newark v. Overseers of Pompton, 3 N.J.L. 1039 (N.J. 1813).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

There is no pretense of fraud set up in this case. If there was any fraud alleged in the transaction, it would be proper to examine it, and might govern the decision. Kellam, under the state of this case, must be [592]*592considered as seized of a freehold estate of the value of fifty pounds. The judgment of the sessions affirming the order of the justices, must be

Affirmed.

Pennington, J.

Being an inhabitant of Newark delivered no opinion.

Cited in Bernards v. Wrrren, 3 Gr. 447. Approved in Nottingham v. Amwell, 1 Zab. 87.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI