Overseers of Newark v. Overseers of Pempton

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Overseers of Newark v. Overseers of Pempton

3 N.J.L. 1038

DecidedSeptember 15, 1813

StatusPublished

This text of 3 N.J.L. 1038 (Overseers of Newark v. Overseers of Pempton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Overseers of Newark v. Overseers of Pempton, 3 N.J.L. 1038 (N.J. 1813).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

There is no pretence of fraud set up in this case. If there wras any fraud alledged in the transaction, it would be proper to examine it, and might govern the decision. Kellam, under the state of this case, must be considered as seized of a freehold estate of the value of fifty pounds. The judgment of the Sessions, affirming the order of the justices, must be

Affirmed.

Pennington, J.

— Being an inhabitant of Newark delivered no opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

There is no pretence of fraud set up in this case. If there wras any fraud alledged in the transaction, it would be proper to examine it, and might govern the decision. Kellam, under the state of this case, must be considered as seized of a freehold estate of the value of fifty pounds. The judgment of the Sessions, affirming the order of the justices, must be

Affirmed.

Pennington, J.

— Being an inhabitant of Newark delivered no opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 N.J.L. 1038, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/overseers-of-newark-v-overseers-of-pempton-nj-1813.