Overseers of Newark v. Overseers of Pempton

3 N.J.L. 1038
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 15, 1813·Published

Opinion

By the Court.

There is no pretence of fraud set up in this case. If there wras any fraud alledged in the transaction, it would be proper to examine it, and might govern the decision. Kellam, under the state of this case, must be considered as seized of a freehold estate of the value of fifty pounds. The judgment of the Sessions, affirming the order of the justices, must be

Affirmed.

Pennington, J.

— Being an inhabitant of Newark delivered no opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Overseers of Newark v. Overseers of Pempton, 3 N.J.L. 1038 (N.J. 1813).

3 N.J.L. 1038 (Overseers of Newark v. Overseers of Pempton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.