Overseers of Germantown v. Overseers of the Poor of Livingston
This text of 2 Cai. Cas. 106 (Overseers of Germantown v. Overseers of the Poor of Livingston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The order of the sessions reversing the order of the justices must be reversed. The admission of the declarations of Philip Rockefellow, after he owned the slave, is too loose and uncertain to charge the town of Germantown, It would be of a very dangerous tendency. Better proof of the fact could be had. Was Rockefellow then in possession of the woman, it might be otherwise. The sayings of one inhabitant, to charge a whole town, might be mischievous, and would be very liable to abuse, especially if better testimony cau be had.
Order of sessions reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Cai. Cas. 106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/overseers-of-germantown-v-overseers-of-the-poor-of-livingston-nysupct-1804.