Overseas Development Bank v. Nothmann

477 N.E.2d 1086, 64 N.Y.2d 927, 488 N.Y.S.2d 632, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 16255
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 19, 1985
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 477 N.E.2d 1086 (Overseas Development Bank v. Nothmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Overseas Development Bank v. Nothmann, 477 N.E.2d 1086, 64 N.Y.2d 927, 488 N.Y.S.2d 632, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 16255 (N.Y. 1985).

Opinion

[928]*928OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the case remitted to that court for consideration of issues not previously reached.

In this action to enforce two money judgments of English courts, the Appellate Division reversed the lower court’s order granting plaintiff summary judgment and dismissed the complaint. In the Appellate Division’s view, the English judgments, by virtue of their age, were not “final, conclusive and enforceable” under CPLR 5302 without a writ of execution upon leave from an English court. Without passing on the reasoning of the court below, we note that plaintiff has now obtained leave from the Queen’s Bench Division of England’s High Court of Justice to issue a writ of execution and, on plaintiff’s motion, the record in this court has been expanded to include documentation of that order. The Appellate Division, having held that CPLR 5302 was not satisfied because of the perceived lack of enforceability, did not reach defendants’ remaining arguments concerning other mandatory and discretionary grounds for denying recognition of the foreign judgments under CPLR 5304. In view of the addition to the record, we remit this case to the Appellate Division for its consideration of those remaining issues.

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Alexander concur.

Order reversed, with costs, and case remitted to the Appellate Division, Second Department, for further proceedings in accordance with the memorandum herein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sea Trade Maritime Corp. v. Coutsodontis
135 A.D.3d 442 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
ENRON (THRACE) EXPLORATION v. Clapp
874 A.2d 561 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2005)
Lenchyshyn v. Pelko Electric, Inc.
281 A.D.2d 42 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Harris S.A. De C.V. v. Grupo Sistemas Integrales De Telecomunicacion S.A. De C.V.
279 A.D.2d 263 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Yihye v. Blumenberg
260 A.D.2d 371 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Overseas Development Bank in Liquidation v. Nothmann
115 A.D.2d 719 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
477 N.E.2d 1086, 64 N.Y.2d 927, 488 N.Y.S.2d 632, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 16255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/overseas-development-bank-v-nothmann-ny-1985.