Overman v. Warwick Cycle Manuf'g Co.

61 F. 986, 10 C.C.A. 222, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2265
CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit
DecidedApril 17, 1894
DocketNo. 71
StatusPublished

This text of 61 F. 986 (Overman v. Warwick Cycle Manuf'g Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Overman v. Warwick Cycle Manuf'g Co., 61 F. 986, 10 C.C.A. 222, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2265 (1st Cir. 1894).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The characteristic feature of the Overman patented saddle is its adaptability for removal and replacement at pleasure. This is the essence of the invention, and constitutes the improvement over prior saddles. The defendant’s saddle embodies a form of construction in which this feature is absent. This is the ground upon which the court below held that the defendant’s saddle did not infringe the Overman patent. We think the court below was right, and we can add nothing to the reason so clearly stated in its opinion. Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
61 F. 986, 10 C.C.A. 222, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/overman-v-warwick-cycle-manufg-co-ca1-1894.