Overman v. Schun Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Overman v. Schun Co.

197 So. 2d 496, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 4063

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedApril 12, 1967

DocketNo. 35972

StatusPublished

This text of 197 So. 2d 496 (Overman v. Schun Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Overman v. Schun Co., 197 So. 2d 496, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 4063 (Fla. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date October 24, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petitions for certiorari and for attorney’s fees are therefore denied.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and DREW, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI