Overman v. Beck

Fourth Circuit

Overman v. Beck

234 F. App'x 158

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Overman v. Beck. Read the opinion of the Court — 186 F. App'x 337 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 25, 2007·No. No. 07-6341·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

John Marvin Overman, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Overman v. Beck, No. 5:05-ct-00687-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 27, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and [159]*159legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

John Marvin Overman, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Overman v. Beck, No. 5:05-ct-00687-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 27, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and [159]*159legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Overman v. Beck, 234 F. App'x 158 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

234 F. App'x 158 (Overman v. Beck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related