Overly v. Overly

Third Circuit

Overly v. Overly

158 F.2d 384, 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 2401

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedDecember 27, 1946

DocketNo. 9198

StatusPublished

This text of 158 F.2d 384 (Overly v. Overly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Overly v. Overly, 158 F.2d 384, 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 2401 (3d Cir. 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an action to establish an alleged oral trust in personal property. The District Court, 65 F.Supp. 174, found against the plaintiff and this finding is the subject [385]*385of appeal. The questions involved are wholly those of fact; the parties have no substantial dispute on the legal points. We have examined the record upon the matters concerning which the appellant claims that the conclusions of the trial court were clearly erroneous. The facts do not, in our opinion, bear out the claim. The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an action to establish an alleged oral trust in personal property. The District Court, 65 F.Supp. 174, found against the plaintiff and this finding is the subject [385]*385of appeal. The questions involved are wholly those of fact; the parties have no substantial dispute on the legal points. We have examined the record upon the matters concerning which the appellant claims that the conclusions of the trial court were clearly erroneous. The facts do not, in our opinion, bear out the claim. The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

158 F.2d 384, 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 2401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/overly-v-overly-ca3-1946.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack