Overly v. Overly

Third Circuit

Overly v. Overly

158 F.2d 384, 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 2401

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided December 27, 1946·No. No. 9198·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an action to establish an alleged oral trust in personal property. The District Court, 65 F.Supp. 174, found against the plaintiff and this finding is the subject [385] of appeal. The questions involved are wholly those of fact; the parties have no substantial dispute on the legal points. We have examined the record upon the matters concerning which the appellant claims that the conclusions of the trial court were clearly erroneous. The facts do not, in our opinion, bear out the claim. The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an action to establish an alleged oral trust in personal property. The District Court, 65 F.Supp. 174, found against the plaintiff and this finding is the subject [385] of appeal. The questions involved are wholly those of fact; the parties have no substantial dispute on the legal points. We have examined the record upon the matters concerning which the appellant claims that the conclusions of the trial court were clearly erroneous. The facts do not, in our opinion, bear out the claim. The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Overly v. Overly, 158 F.2d 384, 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 2401 (3d Cir. 1946).

Pincite

158 F.2d 384 (Overly v. Overly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related