Overland v. . Hardee

119 S.E. 924, 186 N.C. 771, 1923 N.C. LEXIS 345
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedOctober 26, 1923
StatusPublished

This text of 119 S.E. 924 (Overland v. . Hardee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Overland v. . Hardee, 119 S.E. 924, 186 N.C. 771, 1923 N.C. LEXIS 345 (N.C. 1923).

Opinion

Peb CuRiam.

The trial of this cause reduced itself to a controversy over issues of fact, which the jury alone could determine. A careful perusal of the record convinces us that the case has been tried substantially in accordance with the law bearing on the subject, and we have discovered no ruling or .action on the part of the trial court which would seem to require another hearing. The chief exceptions are those directed to alleged errors in the charge and to the court’s refusal to grant the defendants’ motion for judgment as in. case of nonsuit. There is nothing on the record which entitles the defendants to a new trial or to a dismissal.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
119 S.E. 924, 186 N.C. 771, 1923 N.C. LEXIS 345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/overland-v-hardee-nc-1923.