Overland-Knight Co. v. MacCollum

235 A.D. 660

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. We do not consider on this appeal the question whether the judgment should be without prejudice, or intend in any way to intimate whether the judgment should be without prejudice or not. It is open to the appellant to make application to the Special Term for a modification of the judgment in this respect, if he deems himself entitled to a modification. (See Ziegler v. International Railway Co., 232 App. Div. 43.) All concur. Present — Sears, P. J., Crouch, Edgcomb, Thompson and Crosby, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Overland-Knight Co. v. MacCollum, 235 A.D. 660 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

235 A.D. 660 (Overland-Knight Co. v. MacCollum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ziegler v. International Railway Co.
232 A.D. 43 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1931)